Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Licari
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:38, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Frank Licari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has no sources, I think it is an autobiography, also it does not indicate on how the subject is notable ChristianandJericho (talk) 14:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A collecton of pictures that not needed, Delete--Musamies (talk) 02:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Now, most of the sources are facebook... better reason to delete --ChristianandJericho (talk) 10:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I am the creator of this artical and I think this artical needs to stay up on Wikipedia. It is just like articals about Nick Canon and Simon Cowell. Frank is the host of a new, upcoming television show called Recreating a Legend, Just like Nick is to America's Got Talent and Simon is to The X Factor. Frank also is an actor in many television shows, movies, and plays. So he is famous and not some autobiography of a random person. If this article stays on, I will delete the pictures that you think are not needed. Thank you. I really hope this will stay on :) Lostrocks123 (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- they are barely any sources that state why he is notable so, Delete--ChristianandJericho (talk) 14:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have put a lot more sourcesLostrocks123 (talk) 21:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- they are barely any sources that state why he is notable so, Delete--ChristianandJericho (talk) 14:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My vote still stands --ChristianandJericho (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources that confirm or even asserts his notability. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm relisting this debate, as I can find no evidence that it was properly listed at WP:AFD. I make no recommendation to keep or delete, except to note that there is only one source in the article - and that source is not reliable. If the article is to be kept, I would think more reliable sources would be necessary. Note also that the Usual Caveats may apply here - it's possible that Mr. Licari is not notable at present, but may become notable later on. If that happens, an article may be appropriate. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG. No RS's provided. The main Google hits seem to focus on birth and death notices of other people. Imdb page indicates a dozen or so small, undistinguished roles in a dozen or so small, undistinguished projects. Who knows, maybe he will become the next Simon Cowell. Please relist this article then, not now. WP is not a promotional tool. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - never mind GNG, he fails WP:CREATIVE, too. There are no reasonable claims of notability, and no reliable sources. He's not ready for prime time; see also WP:UPANDCOMING, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 17:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:HAMMER does not apply here, as it seems Mr. Licari has a name. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:SPAM. - DonCalo (talk) 19:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.